Accreditation readiness

Accreditation

Your accreditor’s standards, measured against the intelligence you have built. Every standard lists the evidence reviewers expect; the rubric shows what you can already show, what is stale or pending, and exactly what is missing — so you know what to build next.

Open the package Ask AI to review evidence New cycle

OverviewStandards What’s missing 80 Evidence files 46

Evidence readiness

71%On trackacross 73 standards · Core Requirements count double

142 met 9 stale 14 pending 21 possible match 36 missing

38of 73 standards fully evidenced

21with a compliance judgment

14narratives approved

12ready to submit

This measures evidence, not compliance. Only your team records a compliance judgment, and a fully evidenced standard can still be judged partial.

By section

This cycle

Reaffirmation 2027

Reaffirmation — Compliance Certification

Due Mar 15, 2027 · 166 days

activeMark submitted

Your accreditor’s published standards and resource manual.

AI evidence review

AI reads each possible match and scores how likely it answers the evidence item — suggestions are reordered and labelled. You decide what to link.

Reviewed 21 possible matches · 9 likely

Review again

Most urgent gaps

8.1 · Baselines, goals and results, disaggregated Missing

6.2.a · Faculty credentialing policy Possible match

9.1 · Curriculum committee minutes and completed forms Missing

10.7 · Evidence the credit hour policy is applied Pending

All 80 gaps

All standards

Section 6 · Faculty

6.2.aFaculty qualifications

For every educational program, the institution documents each faculty member's qualifications and explains why they are adequate for the courses taught.

Campus paraphrase for planning — your narrative must answer the standard as your accreditor publishes it.

Evidence 33% Evidence partial

Faculty roster with courses taught and qualificationsMetProof of practice

Complete the Faculty Roster Form for everyone who taught a credit course in the review terms, listing courses taught, highest relevant degrees and coursework, and other qualifications (experience, licensure, publications) that justify each assignment.

Faculty Roster Form — Fall 2025 & Spring 2026evidence file

Linked by Marcus Webb

Faculty credentialing policyPossible matchGoverning document

Upload the policy that sets expected faculty qualifications by course level and explains how alternative qualifications are judged.

Possible matchFaculty Handbook 2025–26 AI: likely answers it

“Faculty teaching undergraduate courses hold a master’s degree with at least 18 graduate semester hours in the teaching discipline; the dean documents any alternative qualification.”

Link this sentenceNot this

Faculty Handbook 2025–26Academic

“Faculty teaching undergraduate courses hold a master’s degree with at least 18 graduate semester hours in the teaching discipline; the dean documents any alternative qualification.”

Linked by Dana Ruiz

Definition of instructor of recordMissingGoverning document

Supply the policy defining who counts as instructor of record, so the roster includes everyone who should be on it.

Link other evidence

Supplemental justifications for specific facultyMissingProof of practice · optional

Where the roster alone does not make a faculty member's qualification clear, attach a short written justification; keep faculty files and transcripts ready for on-site review.

Your review

OwnerMarcus Webb · steward Compliance judgmentNot yet judgedYour team’s own determination — the evidence score never sets it. Narrative · No narrativeMake the case for compliance: address every part of the standard, past tense for what was done, present tense for current policy, and point to the linked evidence.

SaveApprove narrative